As far as old debates go there is none older1 than Justification either; by faith or “faith + works” since the “Sola” part of “Sola fide” is the issue of contention. This was dug up (not that it was ever buried) once more quite publicly in the theological skirmish now historically known as “NT Wright vs. John Piper“. As usual many lined up on one side or the other and many blog posts were written that mischaracterised the position of either of the theologians. What wasn’t known by outsiders looking in was just how much the two parties agreed on, relying on rhetoric alone, a lot was lost in what Piper or Wright each uniquely offered in their positions. Continue reading “Engaging BHI; Reading Paul in the shadow of Luther”→
The new film, Silence, by Martin Scorcese focuses on the story of a group of Jesuit priests who go into Japan against the wishes of their elders to find their former mentor who has effectively been ex-communicated for ‘renouncing his faith’ and to continue his mission to spread the Christian message. It’s based on a novel, by Endō and is set in the 1630s, by which time there was already a ban on all foreign missionaries from entering Japan and on all Japanese from leaving. This continued until the 1860’s. Continue reading “A review of Martin Scorsese’s “Silence””→
On June 21, 2016, in the middle of Brexit campaign, this headline appeared on the front page of the Bristol Post:
Bristol UKIP politician tells Muslim: “We don’t want you in our civilised country.”
The dominant narrative of the Colonisation project has often been presented as a noble cause of civilizing the savages. This version of events is again being wheeled for public consumption, necessitated by rapid wearing off of former visions of greatness.
Except, the real story of colonialist’s exploits are not entirely noble and the term civilisation, rightly speaking is not a designation only applicable to the more advanced party.
The Anglo-Zulu war is often presented as an alternative singular event to counter the European civilising narrative, except, this incidence is a prototype of a widespread strategy of provocation and instigation to war with the natives.
One such similar story is that of the punitive “Benin Expedition of 1987” when an entire city was burnt and looted by an army led by Harry Rawson. Prior to the attack, Benin traded with foreigners and was known to be rich in natural resources, this became the actual reason for the invasion, rather than the story of rescuing the people from human sacrifice and slavery – which most probably did occur. Here on January 23,Prior to the attack, Benin traded with foreigners and was known to be rich in natural resources, this became the actual reason for the invasion, rather than the story of rescuing the people from human sacrifice and slavery – which most probably did occur. Continue reading “The Civilisation of the Savages”→
Equiano’s story was clearly important for the abolitionist cause. His account is intentionally emotional and that the book is titled, ‘Kidnapped’ is telling, although, it also has the alternative, original title of, The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano: Or, Gustavus Vassa, the African, Written by Himself.
To call it propaganda would be somewhat disingenuous, but that Equiano was possibly born in South Carolina (rather than an Ebo Village) does force one to reexamine his claims. Although there may be possible explanations for this inconsistency, yet better still, it is not inconceivable that the narrative of the life of the kidnapped prince served the purpose of establishing rights for a man whose (birth) place could be considered historically fictional. Some will consider such an approach justified, given the liberation ends of such a narrative (especially nowadays that activists are popping up everywhere). The end does not justify the exaggerated means, this plays right into the hands of victors who had previously controlled the dominant narrative. Continue reading “Equiano’s curious Argument against Slavery”→
I believe marriage is not just a bond but a sacred bond between a man and a woman. I have had occasion in my life to defend marriage, to stand up for marriage, to believe in the hard work and challenge of marriage. So I take umbrage at anyone who might suggest that those of us who worry about amending the Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that it exists between a man and a woman, going back into the midst of history as one of the founding, foundational institutions of history and humanity and civilization, and that its primary, principal role during those millennia has been the raising and socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults.